The word paradigm in the scientific or design professions is used to indicate a pattern, model, outstandingly clear or typical example or archetype.  These paradigms are the conceptual frameworks that provide a unified perspective over a range of experiences.

The term paradigm within the scientific or design worlds is used to signify a pattern, model, outstandingly lucid or distinctive example or archetype. Such paradigms are usually the conceptual frameworks that offer a unified point of view over a selection of experiences.

Since students mainly learn from and are mentored by others who learned the foundation in their respetive fields from identical models there is seldom any disagreement over the fundamentals. Men whose research is based on shared paradigms are faithful to the same principles, rules and standards in their scientific practice.

Openness to the diversity of thought is generally not welcomed and considered a threat in the majority of professional fields most of which are still dominated by models rooted in old paradigmatic thought.

In the majority of, if not all, scientific fields it is unfortunate that the political and financial institutions that control licensure, standards of ethics, and third-party payments, are rooted in the old paradigms and continue to hold the exclusive rights to define and regulate professional practice.

Most scientists participate in what can be considered as ‘normal science’.  ‘Normal Science’ in this context  is any activity consistent with the existing paradigm and provides relatively small gains in the field as a rule.

When the existing paradigm fails to explain a number of new phenomena or concepts, the science goes into a time of crisis during which a paradigm shift can occur.  These paradigm shifts allows for new growth, new creativity, new ideas, new models—and ultimately a new age.

Throughout the history of the science, paradigm shifts have allowed us to explain previously unexplainable phenomena.  Science introduced and continues to introduce a number of paradigm shifts that change our perception of the universe and of who we are.  These paradigm shifts opened up new avenues and new fields to explore.

“It’s not easy being seen if you find information that does not support the accepted views because the supporters of the accepted views have publicity, money and power to grant degrees. Going along is how proponents of the accepted view obtained their degrees, how they obtained funding and how they obtained their publicity. So how could so many smart people have got it so wrong? A few got it wrong; the rest went along. Self interest, not science, ensured the status quo.”
- C. J. Ransom.

Here is an example of a paradigm shift in physics.  In physics the string theory (now M-theory) proponents originally worked in 10-dimensions.  There was a minority group of physicists who believed that there should be 11-dimensions.  Those who believed that there should be 11-dimensions were practically excommunicated from the ranks of physicists.  However the 10-dimensional model of string theory had a problem with the maths something the 11-dimensional model did not have.  It took a long time, with considerable infighting, but now the 11-dimensional model is now the accepted model.  Even then, like all theoritic models, some scientists have questioned the tangible successes of M-theory given its current incompleteness, and its limited predictive power, despite so many years of intense research.

Cosmology is now in the midst of its own paradigm shift.  Many scientists (away from universities) have ditched the big bang theory in favor of an electric universe.  The electric universe grew out of a broad interdisciplinary approach to science, based more on observations and experiments than abstract theory and recognised the connections between diverse disciplines.

This is a fascinating journey in the world of scientific ideas that are likely to shape the intellectual scenario of the third millennium.

Most revolutions in science have come from people who taught themselves outside the academic system and were not constrained by the fallacies and fashions of the day.  It has been well documented that modern institutions of science operate in such a way as to enforce conformity by preventing the research and publication of revolutionary ideas.  Enlightenment has to come from outside academia.

Unfortunately science is vulnerable to the vested interests and biases of its practitioners as the ‘Global Warming’ (renamed ‘Climate Change’) scam has show only too clearly.

Regrettably we are in need of a major paradigm shift when it comes to the micro-generation of free energy.  The paradigm shift is not only needed in the scientific community but in the political arena as well.

It is unfortunate that our species has a strong tendency towards herding, a dislike to contrariasm and a strong desire for acceptance and popularity.  People fear change, our so-called “leaders” even more, and are willing to hang ayone who dares think outside their limited imagination.

Most of what you get taught is lies. It has to be. Sometimes if you get the truth all at once, you can’t understand it.
- Terry Pratchett.

Hi Guys,

I hope that you’ve all had a really great day.

In this post we shall continue looking at the science and free energy.

Science and Free Energy

It is interesting to note that those who claim that free energy is not possible or that it is a scam have never tried to construct such devices.

They never appear to have had direct contact with someone who is constructing or has constructed such devices. They always say things like I’ve heard that those who bought the plans to build X are disappointed and want their money back, or that ‘free energy’ contravenes the laws of magnetodynamics and thermodynamics.

True scientific method and its shameless inclusion of criticism, contrary theory and open debate makes possible the dismissal of the old and the acceptance of the new.

Unfortunately for us, the history of science has been the history of the suppression of inventions rather than of the bringing of enlightenment.

Fundamentally what is required is a paradigm shift in order to tap into new energy sources.  If energy cannot be created out of nothing and only changed from one state to another how did it get there in the first place?  And even if energy cannot be created out of nothing all we have to do is tap into the energy that is already there and convert it to a type we can use.

If necessary our entire modern physics may have to be rewritten.   This is not a big deal.  It happens all the time.

Let us not forget that once upon a time the world was flat, or that the Sun revolved around it.

There are quite a few scientific principles / laws that were jettisoned once they were no longer appropriate.   Science takes a long time to adjust itself to new paradigms for there are just as many vested interests in academia as there are outside it.   The old guard, many who have built their careers on the previous hypothesis will fight tooth and nail to keep their reputation and status within the community intact.  They do not want to embrace change nor do the take kindly to those who may usurp their authority.

This is why people that go to universities may come out with their degrees or PhD and yet know nothing.

As a side note:  It leads me to remember what happened to one of my grandfathers when he went to university and how he had his academic career cut short by one of his professors.  My grandfather, a brilliant man had an inquiring mind and did not take things at face value.  So instead of simply accepting what they were being taught he always questioned anything that he felt did not ring true.   One of his professors who had taken umbrage to his questioning drew two converging line on the board and told him that they were parallel lines.  My grandfather knew then that his academic career was over.  No matter what he did he was going to be allowed to pass and left the university.

The subject of free energy and perpetual motion has received much undue criticism and misrepresentation over the past years.  If we consider that in the subatomic level all motion is perpetual.

One can understand a certain amount of closed mindedness about a claim that appears to violate some of the most fundamental laws in science.  These laws take on a quasi-religious “scientific” superstitions which have ossified into scientific orthodoxy masquerading as an absolute, immutable truth.

This is especially understandable from some of the professors as they built their careers upon those laws. And they will do anything to retain the current status quo.

Peer review is one of academia’s weapon of choice to control dissenting or alternative views in science, physics, medicine etc.  Neutral academic peer review is nothing but a myth as dissenting arguments are suppressed and tossed out.

The closed-mindedness of many of these supposed men of science, their willingness to go to any lengths to defend a preconceived message, can still surprises me. The stink of their intellectual corruption and deliberate chicanery is often overpowering especially when the science is politicized.

The quest for free energy is a forbidden science.   The materialism or absolute skepticism of the scientific establishment is detrimental to any scientific inquiry that thinks outside the box.   This mentality is only interested in preserving funding for its own projects, those that will not rock the establishment.

There is an organized war going on in science between materialistic theory and anything that could be termed spiritual or metaphysical.  Take for example, Masaru Emoto’s research into the energetics of water, although supported by photographic evidence, has been scoffed at by mainstream science because he has asserted that humans affect their surroundings with their thoughts. However, in quantum physics it is well known that the simple act of observing has an effect upon experiments being conducted.

“The observations that are not explainable by current scientific
theories are the most valuable, for they may propel the field forward in
the next cycle of innovation, possibly to a paradigm shift.”

- D. L. Jewett

It may be comforting to believe that science is an absolute discipline: immune from fads, fanatics and frauds, untroubled by extremists, evangelists, glory-seekers and bigots.  Unfortunately this is not so.  Science is as vulnerable to the vested interests and biases of its practitioners as any corporate entity or political party as the ‘Global Warming’ (renamed ‘Climate Change’) scam has show only too clearly.   Climategate has demonstrated to all that while science itself is valid, individual scientists can be corrupted by their own belief systems.

I’ll leave you today with this quote from Michael Crichton:

“In the end, science offers us the only way out of politics. And if we allow science to become politicized, then we are lost. We will enter the Internet version of the dark ages, an era of shifting fears and wild prejudices, transmitted to people who don’t know any better. That’s not a good future for the human race. That’s our past.”

- Michael Crichton, “Environmentalism as Religion,” (A lecture at the Commonwealth Club, San Francisco, CA, September 15, 2003).

I will continue this article later focusing on science and paradigm shifts.

I wish you everything I wish myself.

Until the next time.

Alain

Check out my review of the top 3 products for renewable home enegy solution
Check out my review of the Home Made Power Plant product
Check out my review of DIY Power System product

Hi Guys,

I hope that you’ve all had a really great day.

In this post we shall continue looking at the reasons for the suppression of free energy technologies.

Why Free Energy Is Being Suppressed

At the moment everyone is under the notion that the only choices currently available sources for “free” or alternative energy are bio-fuels, solar, wind, or tidal current. These are merely the only choices currently being allowed by our respective governments.

The reason why these particular sources of energy are being allowed is that they are relatively expensive, especially on a commercial basis. They simply cannot compete against oil and coal.

And there are problems with these alternatives:

• The wind doesn’t always blow and the sun doesn’t always shine. But apart from that there are huge technological barriers to harvesting enough energy from these sources to meet the needs of a power-hungry world.
• Bio-fuels rely on agriculture, and apart from moving the production of crops away from food production towards crops for bio-fuels causing starvation in many underdeveloped areas, bio-fuel crops still rely on fossil fuels for cultivation and fertilizers.
• Tidal power technology is still very much in its infancy and can only be feasible in particular geographic locations.

Nuclear power is often talked about as a potential alternative to oil, coal or gas it also has its own problems:

• Apart from the fact that nuclear power plants are extremely expensive to build, they produces radioactive waste and there are considerable security issues involved as well.

The micro-generation of wind and solar energy becomes more affordable if you construct solar or wind generating systems yourself but then again it does take a bit of effort and time.

Free or cheap energy are considered too “dangerous” for the current social model; a model that is based on energy scarcity.

Based on the current principles of capitalism, free energy cannot be allowed. The traditional economic system contains three aspects: capital, goods and services.

A new social model needs to be created, a model based on energy abundance. Such a paradigm shift would create endless possibilities for improving our world.

Free or cheap energy would allow us to turn deserts into green fields through desalinization of ocean water.

An abundance of free and clean energy would cause the cost of growing food to drop drastically allowing third-world nations to feed themselves.

Free and cheap energy would ultimately remove the need to fight over energy resources, water or food.

Unfortunately too many powerful people have a vested interest in the industrial/military complex to allow this to happen. They have a vested interest in WAR.

The other problem is the current energy markets. The energy business turns in the region of 4 to 5 trillion dollars a year. This is vastly superior to the drug trade legal or otherwise or the arms trade.

As a commodity the prices of these fuels for the energy market have become artificially controlled by brokers and investors, which is an unfortunate situation for consumers.

Free energy would destroy the majority of oil rich countries and a considerable part of the financial organisations.

Therefore when considering the physically possibility that ‘free’ energy technologies are being suppressed, the economic arguments holds.

The current energy commodities from oil and coal to natural gas are all in some form of competition in the market place and they will not be able to compete with free or cheap renewable energy methods, something that they will not be willing to relinquish.

A further reason for the suppression of “Free energy” systems it that such systems or technologies would completely eliminate our oil-dependant financial systems. Not a bad thing considering what the ‘banksters’ have done to us recently.

And then let us not forget the expenses related to environmental pollution from the consumption of these fuels and the ‘global warming’ scam politicians and their tame scientists have tried to and are using to steal our wealth through carbon taxes. Free, clean and constant energy would stop this scam. Mind you they will try to find something else to try and steal more money from us.

After all in our modern age Energy equals Power and if you control the energy you control the people.

Free energy would transform economies worldwide and while its potential benefits are clear, could spark economic and political upheaval in the short term at least.

A shift to free or cheap energy has the power to cause social disruptions as old industries fade and new ones evolve and any government that is bad at managing that change will also go under.

However, the shift towards ‘free energy’ could be considered as creative destruction. If free energy was freely available we would find ourselves in the 3rd Industrial Revolution and all kinds of labour saving devices that are currently considered as impractical because of their high-energy use would become viable.

The reason we don’t have free energy today is purely down to power and the wish to control people, nothing else.

I believe that in the murky waters of international wheeling and dealing there are moves afoot to allow free energy to be phased in.

This is good news if it were true.

Even if this were true the phasing in will probably be at a snails pace and the world cannot wait for them.

There is a movement on the Internet known as Open Source Energy, which is a collective endeavour that assert that trying to patent and market new alternative energy devices does not work.

Instead we need to combine forces, share our information, build and test our own alternative energy devices. Should enough of us have working, reproducible systems “They” can no longer deny us this knowledge.

Working together for the benefit of all mankind, these brave new Open Source inventors, garage tinkerers, and researchers could eventually reap rewards in excess of those that commercially-minded inventors gain.

I will continue this article later focusing on Science and Free Energy.

I wish you everything I wish myself.

Until the next time.

Alain

Check out my review of the top 3 products for renewable home enegy solution
Check out my review of the Home Made Power Plant product
Check out my review of DIY Power System product

Hi Guys,

I hope that you’ve all had a really great day.

In this post we shall continue looking at the suppression of free energy technologies.

The Suppression of Free Energy Inventions

One of the problems that inventors face is the fact that their inventions are always evaluated for their war potential. This can bring about the unwanted interest by the Pentagon, the CIA or other less well known secret government organisations. It is quite well known that the science and medical fields in the USA are corrupted by the “Intelligence” Services.

Those of us who are interested in free energy technologies are familiar with the suppression of free-energy devices, from Nitro Cells for engines and magnetic motors, to devices for water-splitting and permanent magnet motors.

Considering the ways that both Tesla and Moray’s inventions were suppressed it was decided to see what other inventions regarding free energy have been suppressed.

As it turns out quite a few!

In the USA alone there are over 6000 patents dealing with free energy technologies currently being suppressed for so called security reasons.

The suppression of their inventions takes various forms such as:

• media campaigns to destroy the credibility of the inventor;
• threats against family members or to self;
• suing the inventor or patent holder;
• being bought off;
• not being able to secure financial backing; and
• ultimately death by murder.

Others that have had their inventions suppressed include:

• Bruce De Palma with his N-Machine in 1977. His N-Machine produced 5-times more power than it took to drive it. He was once threatened with having his head blown off as well as with being kidnapped.
• Stanley Meyers water fuel cell which split ordinary tap water into hydrogen and oxygen with far less energy than that required by a normal electrolytic cell. Pentagon official paid him a visit. Meyers found it almost impossible to get financial backing for his invention. Stanley Meyer died suddenly on 21 March 1998 after dining at a restaurant. Many do not believe the official cause of death of cerebral aneurysm. They believe that he was poisoned to suppress the technology.
• Ed Gray for daring to have a power tube with an output power 100 times the input power.
• Bill Williams for running his truck on a Joe Cell. On April 11, 2006 by two unidentified individuals who told him to cease all of his alternative energy work or there would be dire consequences. Williams complied.
• Teruo Kawai’s patented magnetic motor which is 160% efficient

As a side note, why is it that the moment one does not believe the official story you are regarded as a conspiracy theorist?

The above list is but a small sample of inventors who have had their inventions suppressed. To be honest there are literally thousands of inventors who have had their inventions suppressed.
I will continue this article later focusing on why these inventions are being suppressed

I wish you everything I wish myself.

Until the next time.

Alain

Check out my review of the top 3 products for renewable home energy solution
Check out my review of the Home Made Power Plant product
Check out my review of DIY Power System product

Hi Guys,

I hope that you’ve all had a really great day.

This is is a continuation of yesterday’s post regarding the suppression of free energy technologies.

T. Henry Moray

As a boy, Moray had been profoundly inspired by the greatest electrical genius of all time, Nikola Tesla.

Shortly after World War one Moray produced his first elementary device that delivered measureable electrical power. He then went on to produce a free energy device weighing sixty pounds and producing 50,000 watts of electricity for several hours.

Even thought he demonstrated his device repeatedly to scientists and engineers, he could not get funding to develop his device further such as a power station that would furnish electrical power on a mass scale.

Moray continued improving his device whenever he had the time.

Test after test he successfully demonstrated that his device could produce energy without any appreciable energy input. According to exhaustive documentation, no one was ever able to prove that the device was fraudulent or that Moray had not accomplished exactly what he claimed.

During one of his experiments Moray ran his device for 157 hours without any connection to external power sources, and produced over fifty kilowatts of power during the test.

He also established that an additional fifty kilowatts could be added by simply providing another tap further back in the circuit. He had proven beyond doubt that the device was generating electrical energy from free and natural sources without batteries or external power.

Even with all his demonstrations and documentation to back him up, the U.S. Patent Office refused to grant Moray a patent, because his device used a cold cathode in the tubes and because he failed to identify the source of the energy.

The patent office also presented all sorts of unrelated patents and devices as being infringed upon or duplicated by his work. Moray patiently answered and nullified these spurious objections to his patent.

To this day the U.S. Patent Office continues to ignore the patent application and the patent has still not been issued. In spite of all this the Morays still keep the patent application current.

Moray was neither the first nor the last inventor that the U.S. Patent Office ignored or refused to grant patents to. A quick trawl on the web will attest to this.

I hypothesise that this is a way in which the US government and various vested interests try to suppress inventions in various fields.

In the 1930s various powerful people tried to obtain the device. Because he refused to sell out to these people he and his family were threatened and shot at on several occasions and his lab ransacked to stop his free energy research and public demonstrations.

His book, The Sea of Energy in Which the Earth Floats [THE SEA OF ENERGY IN WHICH THE EARTH FLOATS, For Beyond the Light Rays Lies the Secret of the Universe, The Evolution of Energy and Matter Originally compiled for the Layman in 1926 from excerpts of the Writings first presented in 1914] makes for interesting reading.

In his book Moray presents documented evidence that he invented the first transistor-type valve in 1925, far ahead of the officially recognized discovery of the transistor.

The Moray Radiant Energy discovery, using radiations from the cosmos as its power source, gives the greatest amount of energy per pound of equipment of any system known to man.

Take the time to think, if only for a minute, what either Tesla’s wireless electricity or Moray’s device would have meant for mankind. How much further we could have gone if energy was no longer a problem!

I will continue this article tomorrow focusing on the suppression of inventions, especially those in the field of free energy technologies

I wish you everything I wish myself.

Until the next time.

Alain

Check out my review of the top 3 products for renewable home enegy solution
Check out my review of the Home Made Power Plant product
Check out my review of DIY Power System product

Hi Guys,

I hope that you’ve all had a really great day.

Up to now we have looked at various aspects of renewable home energy solution, however there is a crucial element that we haven’t looked at yet: Energy Storage.

Most home energy solutions operate within a just-in-time system framework; that is during the day their solar panels and wind turbines produce electricity and any surplus produced is pushed back into the grid. At night, their reduced electricity production often forces them to draw electricity from the grid.

At best you consume as much as you produce and if you use more than you produce you still have you still have reduced electricity bills.

Although we are going to concentrate on photovoltaic cells for solar energy and wind turbines for home energy solutions I believe that if you have the space then it is advisable to store some of the energy you produce.

Without storage, you operate within a “just-in-time” framework that is not only dependent on your variable end-use demands, but you are also completely at the mercy of one of the most uncontrollable variables known to us: the weather. After all wind turbines are useful only when the wind blows and photovoltaic panels work only when the sun is shining. Energy storage is therefore needed to store surplus electricity produced at times of low demand.

To date cost-effective energy storage has been the orphan stepchild of alternative energy even though energy storage is a core enabling technology for many classes of alternative energy. Because of this power storage has been a key constraint in preventing the widespread adoption and use of solar and wind energy in general.

The trouble is that the period during which energy is generate from renewable sources, cannot always be matched to the time of demand. This leads to volatility in your supply and reduced reliability and stability. Energy storage systems are therefore an integral part of any renewable energy system especially if you go off grid.

Energy storage must consider both the amount of energy that can be stored (energy density of the material) and the efficiency at which it can be recovered.

Short duration storage technologies are frequently more important than long duration systems. In general, technologies that can store huge amounts of energy are not particularly good at releasing it quickly and technologies that can deliver energy quickly are not particularly good at releasing huge amounts of energy.

When an energy storage system is used you get stability within the electrical system and the quality of the voltage supplied will be considerably higher than under a just-in-time system.

From a user point of view there are both technical and commercial criteria for selecting the most suitable technology. This does not stop there though; because when one considers an electricity storage system one has to balance the technical with the economics and each case needs to be looked at individually. It ultimately all boils down to a return on your investment.

As far as energy storage goes conventional, commercially available lead-acid batteries have a very high-energy efficiency and all other energy storage technologies have to compete with this.

Batteries are the most expensive item in renewable home energy systems when considering the system’s total lifetime costs; and there are big variations in battery lifetime in different installations.

Rechargeable batteries or accumulators are the oldest form of electricity storage and are widely used. However, progress in battery technology has been slow.

Batteries can respond to changes in power demand within microseconds. Only super-capacitors equal such a response time. Batteries usually have very low standby losses and can have high energy efficiency, depending on the application and the details of the operation.

Most batteries contain toxic materials, hence the ecological impact from uncontrolled disposal of batteries must always be considered. Because of this current battery research focuses on new and improved materials and manufacturing processes, as well as on their operating conditions.

Ultimately the choice is yours on whether you operate a just-in-time energy system or whether you integrate an energy storage system into your home energy system.

One could start with a just-in-time system and gradually incorporate a energy storage system gradually to your home energy system with some the money you save on your electrical bill.

As always, I wish you everything I wish for myself.

Until the next time.

Alain

Check out my review of the top 3 products for renewable home enegy solution
Check out my review of the Home Made Power Plant product
Check out my review of DIY Power System product

Hi Guys,

I hope that you are having a good day.

Today I got a flyer on the post from a renewable energy company titled:
Renewable Energy: Worried about global warming?

They basically offer a 1.2 kW solar panel system, which according to them will “generate on average nearly 1000 kWh per year”.

The system is guaranteed for 20-years. This ground-mounted system costs £7,999.00 and then they state that it may attract a government grant of £2,400.00. For the average family this is highly unlikely. And if you apply online you are eligible for a further £100.00 discount so that the net cost to you would be £5,499.00.

By having a ground-mounted system may remove the need for planning permission. However, you should always check whether you need to apply for planning permission.

Going back to one of my previous posts titled “Show Me the Money: Your Return on Capital” we can easily demonstrate that even at £5,499.00 this system is not value for money.

My electricity consumption last year came to 6953 kWh for the year. The 6953 kWh cost me £877.78. The above-mentioned system will only provide me with 14.4% of my electricity requirement. Therefore the above mentioned system will save me £126.24/year at the current price of electricity and therefore the break even point for the return on my capital, assuming a 0% interest rate, is £5,499.00/£126.24 = 43,6 years.

The thing is that you can build a comparable system yourself with the right guide providing you with step-by-step information within a budget that is affordable for all people. And don’t, for a minute, think that you need to be a boffin to this as even an inexperienced person can create his or her own solar power generator with relative ease.

Elsewhere they go on about the reduction of your carbon footprint… a reference to the carbon trading schemes the climate-industrial complex with the help of complicit government shills are trying to foist upon us.

The Main Stream Media along with all the other propaganda machines from government to that of the self-serving / vested interest of the climate-industrial complex keep bombarding you with global warming / climate change as if a lie repeated often becomes the truth…

As the global warming scam is more and more faith based rather than scientific they clutch more and more at straws to push their punitive “green” taxes upon us.

So am I worried about global warming the answer is an emphatic NO. I only wish that we were getting warmer. Hell, during roman times it was warm enough for them to plant vineyards and orange grove up to Hadrian’s wall. And I’ve said before if the met office has enough difficulties in predicting the weather for the next couple of days with any accuracy how the hell would the be able to predict global warming / climate change for the next year (Their BBQ summer did not materialize) let alone 10, 20 or a hundred years from now.

On a weekly, if not a daily, basis I see the myth being dismantled with many of the faithful turning their backs on the false church of man made global warming. As for climate change… well what of it. Climate change is a natural phenomena partly caused by the sun, the earth’s magnetic fields and what goes on deep within the earth core.

The only thing we can do about climate change is to live with it the best we can. We also need to educate ourselves so that we can distinguish what is real and what is caused by the smoke and mirrors of vested interests.

Save on your energy bills by generating your own power at home with solar and wind energy to reduce or eliminate your power bill. Get our complete guide at DIY Power System

As always, I wish you everything I wish myself.

Until the next time.

Alain

Check out my review of the top 3 products for renewable home enegy solution
Check out my review of the Home Made Power Plant product
Check out my review of DIY Power System product

Hi Guys,

I hope that you are having a good day.

“The beginning of a revolution is in reality the end of a belief” – Gustave LeBon

I think that this is a great quote. It applies to so many things today and to the way we get our energy as well. We don’t have to get our energy from utility companies any more – not if we do not want to.

Micro-generation of energy is allowing a revolution to occur – it is only a matter of taking the responsibility to generate our own power.

Whilst I did head my previous post “Free Energy – Perpetual motion machines” we all know that perpetual motion machines do not exist yet – and maybe never will. However any machine that produces more energy than it uses and each initiation lasting days, weeks, months, or years – is as close to a perpetual motion device one can get.

My current property does not lend itself to the construction of either solar panels or windmills and so I’ve been looking for an alternative to generate my own power.

While I can build and install a small number of solar panels, their efficacy will be limited. The same can be said for a wind power generator in the form of a windmill.

A zero point magnetic power generator on the other hand, appears to be quite viable and doable.

With both, solar and wind generated power I will have to store the energy in batteries. This can be quite costly. The initial cost of setting up a reasonable amount of storage can be prohibitive, so unless I am willing to be without electricity at one time or other it is something that you would have to construct.

However, as the zero point magnetic power generator runs continuously, 24/7, the need to store the energy produced is removed.

Utility companies have been gouging consumers for a long time and they have been able to do so with government complicity and because, you the consumers didn’t have any other options.

Now through the use of magnetic power generator using zero point energy you are able to generate all the FREE / GREEN energy you need – without ANY third party help or outside influence.



Magnetic Power Generator using Zero Point Energy makes use of the extra energy created by the generators magnets and we use this extra energy before it is wasted.

A zero point magnetic power generator sounds a lot more complicated than it actually is. Most people are familiar with magnetic fields and that that field has a certain strength / power. The fact that magnets can stick to metal should be evident to demonstrate that there is energy that can extract from this.

Whilst this type of technology appears to be out of the reach of the common man, the reality is that it is much simpler for an individual to set up than for a utility company to use.

You will undoubtedly realize that the main benefit of using such a zero point magnetic power generator is saving money on your electricity bill. This device can save you a significant amount of money over the long run since energy costs are expected to grow over the years.

You don’t have to be a boffin to construct a zero point magnetic power generator. It is relatively simple for anyone to create one. Whilst a lot of people think that the creation of electricity is very complicated, the reality is that it isn’t.

The most difficult and expensive part of creating electricity is the ability to spin the turbine. In this case you use the power of magnets to perpetually spin a turbine and create power for your home.

With the right guide providing you with step-by-step information, even an inexperienced person can create his or her own zero point magnetic power generator with relative ease and within a budget that is affordable for all people.

So CLICK HERE to see whether this could be for you

Stay tuned for further development our quest for ‘free’ energy .

As always, I wish you everything I wish myself.

Until the next time.

Alain

Check out my review of the top 3 products for renewable home enegy solution
Check out my review of the Home Made Power Plant product
Check out my review of DIY Power System product

Hi Guys,

I hope that you are having a good day.

The UK’s Mail Online Science and Tech section on the 27th August 2009 reported that the Met Office’s weather supercomputer used to predict climate change is one of Britain’s worst polluters.

I wouldn’t go as far as that. It is not polluting directly. What it does is guzzle electricity which in the global warmist / environmental camp translates to a carbon footprint.

What bothers me is that they keep on trying to infer that carbon dioxide is a pollutant. That is pure bullshit. Carbon dioxide is one of the building blocks of life. Plants absorb it to grow and animals, including us, exhale it as we breathe.

As far as I’m concerned it is a waste of time and money. Let’s face it, it can hardly predict the following day’s weather accurately, so how will it be able to predict the weather/climate change in 1, 10, 20 or more years into the future especially when it predicted a “BBQ summer” which turned out to be another wash-out summer with the occasional nice day.

When it comes to modeling anything on a computer the old adage still holds true – garbage in, garbage out.

The super-computer is pretty impressive, as it is more powerful than 100,000 standard personal computers. At a cost of £33 million it is capable of 1000 billion calculations per second and uses 1.2 megawatts of energy to run. And so it does appear that others may use a tad more electricity than St Al Bore.

When you go on their website you can see that they have invested quite a bit of time and effort on global warming/climate change. Unfortunately for them there is an easier way of predicting long term climate change and it has nothing to do with carbon dioxide or man made “pollution” – it relies on observing solar activity such as sun spots etc to determine whether it is going to get hotter or cooler on the cosmic spec of dust we call earth.

As always, I wish you everything I wish myself.

Until the next time.

Alain

Check out my review of the top 3 products for renewable home enegy solution
Check out my review of the Home Made Power Plant product
Check out my review of DIY Power System product