A paradigm shift in motion

The word paradigm in the scientific or design professions is used to indicate a pattern, model, outstandingly clear or typical example or archetype.  These paradigms are the conceptual frameworks that provide a unified perspective over a range of experiences.

The term paradigm within the scientific or design worlds is used to signify a pattern, model, outstandingly lucid or distinctive example or archetype. Such paradigms are usually the conceptual frameworks that offer a unified point of view over a selection of experiences.

Since students mainly learn from and are mentored by others who learned the foundation in their respetive fields from identical models there is seldom any disagreement over the fundamentals. Men whose research is based on shared paradigms are faithful to the same principles, rules and standards in their scientific practice.

Openness to the diversity of thought is generally not welcomed and considered a threat in the majority of professional fields most of which are still dominated by models rooted in old paradigmatic thought.

In the majority of, if not all, scientific fields it is unfortunate that the political and financial institutions that control licensure, standards of ethics, and third-party payments, are rooted in the old paradigms and continue to hold the exclusive rights to define and regulate professional practice.

Most scientists participate in what can be considered as ‘normal science’.  ‘Normal Science’ in this context  is any activity consistent with the existing paradigm and provides relatively small gains in the field as a rule.

When the existing paradigm fails to explain a number of new phenomena or concepts, the science goes into a time of crisis during which a paradigm shift can occur.  These paradigm shifts allows for new growth, new creativity, new ideas, new models—and ultimately a new age.

Throughout the history of the science, paradigm shifts have allowed us to explain previously unexplainable phenomena.  Science introduced and continues to introduce a number of paradigm shifts that change our perception of the universe and of who we are.  These paradigm shifts opened up new avenues and new fields to explore.

“It’s not easy being seen if you find information that does not support the accepted views because the supporters of the accepted views have publicity, money and power to grant degrees. Going along is how proponents of the accepted view obtained their degrees, how they obtained funding and how they obtained their publicity. So how could so many smart people have got it so wrong? A few got it wrong; the rest went along. Self interest, not science, ensured the status quo.”
- C. J. Ransom.

Here is an example of a paradigm shift in physics.  In physics the string theory (now M-theory) proponents originally worked in 10-dimensions.  There was a minority group of physicists who believed that there should be 11-dimensions.  Those who believed that there should be 11-dimensions were practically excommunicated from the ranks of physicists.  However the 10-dimensional model of string theory had a problem with the maths something the 11-dimensional model did not have.  It took a long time, with considerable infighting, but now the 11-dimensional model is now the accepted model.  Even then, like all theoritic models, some scientists have questioned the tangible successes of M-theory given its current incompleteness, and its limited predictive power, despite so many years of intense research.

Cosmology is now in the midst of its own paradigm shift.  Many scientists (away from universities) have ditched the big bang theory in favor of an electric universe.  The electric universe grew out of a broad interdisciplinary approach to science, based more on observations and experiments than abstract theory and recognised the connections between diverse disciplines.

This is a fascinating journey in the world of scientific ideas that are likely to shape the intellectual scenario of the third millennium.

Most revolutions in science have come from people who taught themselves outside the academic system and were not constrained by the fallacies and fashions of the day.  It has been well documented that modern institutions of science operate in such a way as to enforce conformity by preventing the research and publication of revolutionary ideas.  Enlightenment has to come from outside academia.

Unfortunately science is vulnerable to the vested interests and biases of its practitioners as the ‘Global Warming’ (renamed ‘Climate Change’) scam has show only too clearly.

Regrettably we are in need of a major paradigm shift when it comes to the micro-generation of free energy.  The paradigm shift is not only needed in the scientific community but in the political arena as well.

It is unfortunate that our species has a strong tendency towards herding, a dislike to contrariasm and a strong desire for acceptance and popularity.  People fear change, our so-called “leaders” even more, and are willing to hang ayone who dares think outside their limited imagination.

Most of what you get taught is lies. It has to be. Sometimes if you get the truth all at once, you can’t understand it.
- Terry Pratchett.

Hi Guys,

I hope that you’ve all had a really great day.

In this post we shall continue looking at the science and free energy.

Science and Free Energy

It is interesting to note that those who claim that free energy is not possible or that it is a scam have never tried to construct such devices.

They never appear to have had direct contact with someone who is constructing or has constructed such devices. They always say things like I’ve heard that those who bought the plans to build X are disappointed and want their money back, or that ‘free energy’ contravenes the laws of magnetodynamics and thermodynamics.

True scientific method and its shameless inclusion of criticism, contrary theory and open debate makes possible the dismissal of the old and the acceptance of the new.

Unfortunately for us, the history of science has been the history of the suppression of inventions rather than of the bringing of enlightenment.

Fundamentally what is required is a paradigm shift in order to tap into new energy sources.  If energy cannot be created out of nothing and only changed from one state to another how did it get there in the first place?  And even if energy cannot be created out of nothing all we have to do is tap into the energy that is already there and convert it to a type we can use.

If necessary our entire modern physics may have to be rewritten.   This is not a big deal.  It happens all the time.

Let us not forget that once upon a time the world was flat, or that the Sun revolved around it.

There are quite a few scientific principles / laws that were jettisoned once they were no longer appropriate.   Science takes a long time to adjust itself to new paradigms for there are just as many vested interests in academia as there are outside it.   The old guard, many who have built their careers on the previous hypothesis will fight tooth and nail to keep their reputation and status within the community intact.  They do not want to embrace change nor do the take kindly to those who may usurp their authority.

This is why people that go to universities may come out with their degrees or PhD and yet know nothing.

As a side note:  It leads me to remember what happened to one of my grandfathers when he went to university and how he had his academic career cut short by one of his professors.  My grandfather, a brilliant man had an inquiring mind and did not take things at face value.  So instead of simply accepting what they were being taught he always questioned anything that he felt did not ring true.   One of his professors who had taken umbrage to his questioning drew two converging line on the board and told him that they were parallel lines.  My grandfather knew then that his academic career was over.  No matter what he did he was going to be allowed to pass and left the university.

The subject of free energy and perpetual motion has received much undue criticism and misrepresentation over the past years.  If we consider that in the subatomic level all motion is perpetual.

One can understand a certain amount of closed mindedness about a claim that appears to violate some of the most fundamental laws in science.  These laws take on a quasi-religious “scientific” superstitions which have ossified into scientific orthodoxy masquerading as an absolute, immutable truth.

This is especially understandable from some of the professors as they built their careers upon those laws. And they will do anything to retain the current status quo.

Peer review is one of academia’s weapon of choice to control dissenting or alternative views in science, physics, medicine etc.  Neutral academic peer review is nothing but a myth as dissenting arguments are suppressed and tossed out.

The closed-mindedness of many of these supposed men of science, their willingness to go to any lengths to defend a preconceived message, can still surprises me. The stink of their intellectual corruption and deliberate chicanery is often overpowering especially when the science is politicized.

The quest for free energy is a forbidden science.   The materialism or absolute skepticism of the scientific establishment is detrimental to any scientific inquiry that thinks outside the box.   This mentality is only interested in preserving funding for its own projects, those that will not rock the establishment.

There is an organized war going on in science between materialistic theory and anything that could be termed spiritual or metaphysical.  Take for example, Masaru Emoto’s research into the energetics of water, although supported by photographic evidence, has been scoffed at by mainstream science because he has asserted that humans affect their surroundings with their thoughts. However, in quantum physics it is well known that the simple act of observing has an effect upon experiments being conducted.

“The observations that are not explainable by current scientific
theories are the most valuable, for they may propel the field forward in
the next cycle of innovation, possibly to a paradigm shift.”

- D. L. Jewett

It may be comforting to believe that science is an absolute discipline: immune from fads, fanatics and frauds, untroubled by extremists, evangelists, glory-seekers and bigots.  Unfortunately this is not so.  Science is as vulnerable to the vested interests and biases of its practitioners as any corporate entity or political party as the ‘Global Warming’ (renamed ‘Climate Change’) scam has show only too clearly.   Climategate has demonstrated to all that while science itself is valid, individual scientists can be corrupted by their own belief systems.

I’ll leave you today with this quote from Michael Crichton:

“In the end, science offers us the only way out of politics. And if we allow science to become politicized, then we are lost. We will enter the Internet version of the dark ages, an era of shifting fears and wild prejudices, transmitted to people who don’t know any better. That’s not a good future for the human race. That’s our past.”

- Michael Crichton, “Environmentalism as Religion,” (A lecture at the Commonwealth Club, San Francisco, CA, September 15, 2003).

I will continue this article later focusing on science and paradigm shifts.

I wish you everything I wish myself.

Until the next time.

Alain

Check out my review of the top 3 products for renewable home enegy solution
Check out my review of the Home Made Power Plant product
Check out my review of DIY Power System product

Hi Guys,

I hope that you’ve all had a really great day.

In this post we shall continue looking at the reasons for the suppression of free energy technologies.

Why Free Energy Is Being Suppressed

At the moment everyone is under the notion that the only choices currently available sources for “free” or alternative energy are bio-fuels, solar, wind, or tidal current. These are merely the only choices currently being allowed by our respective governments.

The reason why these particular sources of energy are being allowed is that they are relatively expensive, especially on a commercial basis. They simply cannot compete against oil and coal.

And there are problems with these alternatives:

• The wind doesn’t always blow and the sun doesn’t always shine. But apart from that there are huge technological barriers to harvesting enough energy from these sources to meet the needs of a power-hungry world.
• Bio-fuels rely on agriculture, and apart from moving the production of crops away from food production towards crops for bio-fuels causing starvation in many underdeveloped areas, bio-fuel crops still rely on fossil fuels for cultivation and fertilizers.
• Tidal power technology is still very much in its infancy and can only be feasible in particular geographic locations.

Nuclear power is often talked about as a potential alternative to oil, coal or gas it also has its own problems:

• Apart from the fact that nuclear power plants are extremely expensive to build, they produces radioactive waste and there are considerable security issues involved as well.

The micro-generation of wind and solar energy becomes more affordable if you construct solar or wind generating systems yourself but then again it does take a bit of effort and time.

Free or cheap energy are considered too “dangerous” for the current social model; a model that is based on energy scarcity.

Based on the current principles of capitalism, free energy cannot be allowed. The traditional economic system contains three aspects: capital, goods and services.

A new social model needs to be created, a model based on energy abundance. Such a paradigm shift would create endless possibilities for improving our world.

Free or cheap energy would allow us to turn deserts into green fields through desalinization of ocean water.

An abundance of free and clean energy would cause the cost of growing food to drop drastically allowing third-world nations to feed themselves.

Free and cheap energy would ultimately remove the need to fight over energy resources, water or food.

Unfortunately too many powerful people have a vested interest in the industrial/military complex to allow this to happen. They have a vested interest in WAR.

The other problem is the current energy markets. The energy business turns in the region of 4 to 5 trillion dollars a year. This is vastly superior to the drug trade legal or otherwise or the arms trade.

As a commodity the prices of these fuels for the energy market have become artificially controlled by brokers and investors, which is an unfortunate situation for consumers.

Free energy would destroy the majority of oil rich countries and a considerable part of the financial organisations.

Therefore when considering the physically possibility that ‘free’ energy technologies are being suppressed, the economic arguments holds.

The current energy commodities from oil and coal to natural gas are all in some form of competition in the market place and they will not be able to compete with free or cheap renewable energy methods, something that they will not be willing to relinquish.

A further reason for the suppression of “Free energy” systems it that such systems or technologies would completely eliminate our oil-dependant financial systems. Not a bad thing considering what the ‘banksters’ have done to us recently.

And then let us not forget the expenses related to environmental pollution from the consumption of these fuels and the ‘global warming’ scam politicians and their tame scientists have tried to and are using to steal our wealth through carbon taxes. Free, clean and constant energy would stop this scam. Mind you they will try to find something else to try and steal more money from us.

After all in our modern age Energy equals Power and if you control the energy you control the people.

Free energy would transform economies worldwide and while its potential benefits are clear, could spark economic and political upheaval in the short term at least.

A shift to free or cheap energy has the power to cause social disruptions as old industries fade and new ones evolve and any government that is bad at managing that change will also go under.

However, the shift towards ‘free energy’ could be considered as creative destruction. If free energy was freely available we would find ourselves in the 3rd Industrial Revolution and all kinds of labour saving devices that are currently considered as impractical because of their high-energy use would become viable.

The reason we don’t have free energy today is purely down to power and the wish to control people, nothing else.

I believe that in the murky waters of international wheeling and dealing there are moves afoot to allow free energy to be phased in.

This is good news if it were true.

Even if this were true the phasing in will probably be at a snails pace and the world cannot wait for them.

There is a movement on the Internet known as Open Source Energy, which is a collective endeavour that assert that trying to patent and market new alternative energy devices does not work.

Instead we need to combine forces, share our information, build and test our own alternative energy devices. Should enough of us have working, reproducible systems “They” can no longer deny us this knowledge.

Working together for the benefit of all mankind, these brave new Open Source inventors, garage tinkerers, and researchers could eventually reap rewards in excess of those that commercially-minded inventors gain.

I will continue this article later focusing on Science and Free Energy.

I wish you everything I wish myself.

Until the next time.

Alain

Check out my review of the top 3 products for renewable home enegy solution
Check out my review of the Home Made Power Plant product
Check out my review of DIY Power System product

Hi Guys,

I hope that you’ve all had a really great day.

In this post we shall continue looking at the suppression of free energy technologies.

The Suppression of Free Energy Inventions

One of the problems that inventors face is the fact that their inventions are always evaluated for their war potential. This can bring about the unwanted interest by the Pentagon, the CIA or other less well known secret government organisations. It is quite well known that the science and medical fields in the USA are corrupted by the “Intelligence” Services.

Those of us who are interested in free energy technologies are familiar with the suppression of free-energy devices, from Nitro Cells for engines and magnetic motors, to devices for water-splitting and permanent magnet motors.

Considering the ways that both Tesla and Moray’s inventions were suppressed it was decided to see what other inventions regarding free energy have been suppressed.

As it turns out quite a few!

In the USA alone there are over 6000 patents dealing with free energy technologies currently being suppressed for so called security reasons.

The suppression of their inventions takes various forms such as:

• media campaigns to destroy the credibility of the inventor;
• threats against family members or to self;
• suing the inventor or patent holder;
• being bought off;
• not being able to secure financial backing; and
• ultimately death by murder.

Others that have had their inventions suppressed include:

• Bruce De Palma with his N-Machine in 1977. His N-Machine produced 5-times more power than it took to drive it. He was once threatened with having his head blown off as well as with being kidnapped.
• Stanley Meyers water fuel cell which split ordinary tap water into hydrogen and oxygen with far less energy than that required by a normal electrolytic cell. Pentagon official paid him a visit. Meyers found it almost impossible to get financial backing for his invention. Stanley Meyer died suddenly on 21 March 1998 after dining at a restaurant. Many do not believe the official cause of death of cerebral aneurysm. They believe that he was poisoned to suppress the technology.
• Ed Gray for daring to have a power tube with an output power 100 times the input power.
• Bill Williams for running his truck on a Joe Cell. On April 11, 2006 by two unidentified individuals who told him to cease all of his alternative energy work or there would be dire consequences. Williams complied.
• Teruo Kawai’s patented magnetic motor which is 160% efficient

As a side note, why is it that the moment one does not believe the official story you are regarded as a conspiracy theorist?

The above list is but a small sample of inventors who have had their inventions suppressed. To be honest there are literally thousands of inventors who have had their inventions suppressed.
I will continue this article later focusing on why these inventions are being suppressed

I wish you everything I wish myself.

Until the next time.

Alain

Check out my review of the top 3 products for renewable home energy solution
Check out my review of the Home Made Power Plant product
Check out my review of DIY Power System product

Hi Guys,

I hope that you’ve all had a really great day.

This is is a continuation of yesterday’s post regarding the suppression of free energy technologies.

T. Henry Moray

As a boy, Moray had been profoundly inspired by the greatest electrical genius of all time, Nikola Tesla.

Shortly after World War one Moray produced his first elementary device that delivered measureable electrical power. He then went on to produce a free energy device weighing sixty pounds and producing 50,000 watts of electricity for several hours.

Even thought he demonstrated his device repeatedly to scientists and engineers, he could not get funding to develop his device further such as a power station that would furnish electrical power on a mass scale.

Moray continued improving his device whenever he had the time.

Test after test he successfully demonstrated that his device could produce energy without any appreciable energy input. According to exhaustive documentation, no one was ever able to prove that the device was fraudulent or that Moray had not accomplished exactly what he claimed.

During one of his experiments Moray ran his device for 157 hours without any connection to external power sources, and produced over fifty kilowatts of power during the test.

He also established that an additional fifty kilowatts could be added by simply providing another tap further back in the circuit. He had proven beyond doubt that the device was generating electrical energy from free and natural sources without batteries or external power.

Even with all his demonstrations and documentation to back him up, the U.S. Patent Office refused to grant Moray a patent, because his device used a cold cathode in the tubes and because he failed to identify the source of the energy.

The patent office also presented all sorts of unrelated patents and devices as being infringed upon or duplicated by his work. Moray patiently answered and nullified these spurious objections to his patent.

To this day the U.S. Patent Office continues to ignore the patent application and the patent has still not been issued. In spite of all this the Morays still keep the patent application current.

Moray was neither the first nor the last inventor that the U.S. Patent Office ignored or refused to grant patents to. A quick trawl on the web will attest to this.

I hypothesise that this is a way in which the US government and various vested interests try to suppress inventions in various fields.

In the 1930s various powerful people tried to obtain the device. Because he refused to sell out to these people he and his family were threatened and shot at on several occasions and his lab ransacked to stop his free energy research and public demonstrations.

His book, The Sea of Energy in Which the Earth Floats [THE SEA OF ENERGY IN WHICH THE EARTH FLOATS, For Beyond the Light Rays Lies the Secret of the Universe, The Evolution of Energy and Matter Originally compiled for the Layman in 1926 from excerpts of the Writings first presented in 1914] makes for interesting reading.

In his book Moray presents documented evidence that he invented the first transistor-type valve in 1925, far ahead of the officially recognized discovery of the transistor.

The Moray Radiant Energy discovery, using radiations from the cosmos as its power source, gives the greatest amount of energy per pound of equipment of any system known to man.

Take the time to think, if only for a minute, what either Tesla’s wireless electricity or Moray’s device would have meant for mankind. How much further we could have gone if energy was no longer a problem!

I will continue this article tomorrow focusing on the suppression of inventions, especially those in the field of free energy technologies

I wish you everything I wish myself.

Until the next time.

Alain

Check out my review of the top 3 products for renewable home enegy solution
Check out my review of the Home Made Power Plant product
Check out my review of DIY Power System product